Match intelligence

Chicago Fire — Portland Timbers: Win probabilities, 16.08.2026

League: MLS (USA) · Kick-off:

Full time

Final result

✓ Prediction hit
Chicago Fire2
:
1Portland Timbers
Locked signal BTTS Probability 68.3% Verdict Hit
Mathematical model

Win probabilities

Outcome probabilities after removing the bookmaker margin

Odds updated
W1 62.7% Home win Chicago Fire
X 20.2% Draw
W2 17.1% Away win Portland Timbers
Check current terms · 1WIN18+ Bonus up to $500 Sports betting, live markets and mobile app. Available only to users of legal gambling age in eligible regions.
Check available odds
Market matrix

Markets

Double chance
1X82.9%
Both teams to score
Yes68.7%
Totals 2.5
Over74.1%

All calculated markets

MarketSelectionProbability
Double chance1X82.9%
1279.8%
X237.3%
Both teams to scoreYes/No68.7% / 31.3%
Totals 0.5 Over/Under 96.7% / 3.3%
Totals 1.5 Over/Under 90.9% / 9.1%
Totals 2.5 Over/Under 74.1% / 25.9%
Totals 3.5 Over/Under 53.9% / 46.1%
Totals 4.5 Over/Under 34.4% / 65.6%
Totals 5.5 Over/Under 19.4% / 80.6%
Goal distribution model

Score probability heatmap

Home goals run vertically; away goals run horizontally

Chicago Fire × Portland Timbers
HomeAway
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
0:0 3.3%
0:1 1.6%
0:2 1.8%
0:3 0.8%
0:4 0.3%
0:5 0.1%
1
1:0 4.2%
1:1 8.2%
1:2 4.7%
1:3 2.1%
1:4 0.7%
1:5 0.2%
2
2:0 6.8%
2:1 9.0%
2:2 5.9%
2:3 2.6%
2:4 0.9%
2:5 0.2%
3
3:0 5.8%
3:1 7.6%
3:2 5.0%
3:3 2.2%
3:4 0.7%
3:5 0.2%
4
4:0 3.7%
4:1 4.8%
4:2 3.2%
4:3 1.4%
4:4 0.5%
4:5 0.1%
5
5:0 1.9%
5:1 2.5%
5:2 1.6%
5:3 0.7%
5:4 0.2%
5:5 0.1%
Most likely scores
2:19.0%
1:18.2%
3:17.6%
2:06.8%
2:25.9%
AI analysis

Match preview

Model · GPT 5.6 Luna

Chicago Fire come into this MLS meeting with the stronger overall outlook against Portland Timbers. The assessment gives the hosts a clear advantage, although the moderate confidence level suggests that this is not an entirely one-sided contest. Chicago Fire are expected to have the better platform to control the match and create the more convincing attacking situations, while Portland Timbers remain capable of keeping the game competitive.

The main expectation is an open, high-scoring encounter in which both teams are likely to find the net. That points to a match shaped by attacking intent rather than a cautious tactical battle, with Portland Timbers potentially able to exploit spaces even if Chicago Fire carry the greater threat. The most prominent scoreline is 2:1 to Chicago Fire, while 1:1 and 3:1 also reflect the range of plausible outcomes. Overall, the hosts hold the clearer edge, but the likelihood of goals from both sides makes a narrow and competitive result more credible than a routine victory.

Current context

What matters before kick-off

Updated
Availability

Player Availability for Matchday 20

Chicago Fire are without André Franco and Mbekezeli Mbokazi due to lower body injuries, with Sergio Oregel Jr. questionable. Portland Timbers miss Alexander Aravena (hip), Alex Bonetig (upper body), Juan Mosquera, and Ian Smith (both foot/ankle).

AI collected this context from public sources; it does not change the mathematical probabilities.

Other matches

→ MLS

After the analysis · 1WIN18+ Bonus up to $500 Sports betting, live markets and mobile app. Available only to users of legal gambling age in eligible regions.
View offer
OFFICIAL ODDMIND.APP TELEGRAM CHANNEL New predictions — automatically in Telegram Get new signals and full-analysis links as soon as they are published. Join the channel
About the method

Prediction questions

We remove the bookmaker margin from market odds, estimate each team’s expected goals and build one matrix of possible scores. Outcomes, totals, both teams to score and likely scores all come from that matrix.

Fair odds are one divided by the probability of the main signal. They are a mathematical reference without bookmaker margin, not an offer from a particular bookmaker.

The official prediction is locked before kick-off and is never rewritten after publication. After the final whistle it is checked against the result and added to the public record.

AI does not calculate or change probabilities. It explains the mathematical output in plain language, and the model used is shown next to the analysis.

18+ All materials are informational and do not guarantee any outcome. Predictions are produced by an automated model; the method is described on the Method page. Responsible gambling